But we do not live in an ideal world, where every soul actually behaves that way. Humanity is plagued by an insidious disease, and the germs are power, prejudice, opinion, and judgement. People with prejudice strive for power, people with power force their opinion, and people with opinion easily pass judgement. Ever since someone discovered that their higher strength, loudness of voice, and lack of scruples could make people cower and become submissive, facts and empathy took a backseat. And the disease persists regardless of civilization having come a long way, though it has taken a milder form in certain pockets.
So the issue with humanism is that it cannot be taken up as a cause. It is too broad and too generic for anyone to process and be passionate about. Therefore, it has been broken down into focused causes, feminism being one of them (on parallel lines, the phrase 'Black Lives Matter' does not mean that all lives do not matter, it is simply a response to a sustained series of events that appears to target a specific race and is an apparent result of prejudice).
Regardless of the negative connotations attached to the term feminism, it exists because it has a valid reason to. We as a species are not far along enough to be thinking of everyone as a person. There are human beings, and there are women. Therein lies the rub. The word 'man' pervades everything - hu'man', wo'man', hu'man'ity, 'man'y etc. God is generally referred to as a 'He', and while citing any example, we have to remind ourselves to say 'he/she' in order to be politically correct. The female gender is somehow thought of as a different species.
So the problem with the gender 'equality' conversation is that it talks about bringing women to the table. What people seem to forget is that women have always been at the table. It's the egotistic men who have conveniently chosen to ignore them, and are now reluctantly yielding the floor when faced with pressure to do the right thing. The transition is neither natural, nor organic, but it will slowly become exactly that in a few generations. And there is something to be said about the women who are enablers of this prejudice - every mother who raises her boy and girl differently is complicit, regardless of whatever circumstance forced her mindset.
The right phrase to describe feminism should be gender neutrality, not gender equality. And that does not mean one gender needs to prove their mettle in everything that the other gender has. It simply means that gender should not be a point of discussion where it does not need to, full allowances made if it IS a point of discussion due to the nature of the responsibility, and there should be no condescension or prejudice at play in the process. Resilience, emotional strength, empathy, and integrity are qualities not specific to gender, yet somehow get processed differently based on which gender is displaying them. A confident man is a confident man, but a confident woman is brash, overbearing, and argumentative. That should not be the case. And there should be no differentiation because of things being approached or done differently by the genders.
Objectification is a major issue, and there are 2 aspects to this. The first is the overhyped concept of beauty - looks are something you are born with, not something you develop with dedication and perseverance. And complimenting someone solely on their looks just perpetuates the hype. The second is a result of the first - the concept of beauty has led to rampant objectification of women, and that is a tragedy. And somehow man, threatened by that beauty, appointed himself guardian (read 'owner') of that beauty, and started dictating what women should or should not do. While this exists to some extent in every culture, it is at ridiculous extremes in specific ones where the law itself refuses to recognize women as human beings. And even in the developed world, female body parts are used to sell electronics, automobiles, and anything and everything that is not in context. So how exactly is it a developed world? Beauty pageants still abound, and looks sell more than voices. Why?
Human biology is not helpful in the process - when equipped with higher strength, the protruding object will force its way into a recessed object without any thought to respect or empathy, when driven by prejudice, opinion, and utterly infuriating and quaint concepts of what is right and wrong. The right biological design would have ensured equal strength across both genders, and the reproductive organs designed not as provider and receiver.
The current biological design begs a simple question regarding the sexual crimes that happen against women - when you drive a car irresponsibly and hurt people, you lose your license. So if you are equipped with an appendage that you use to bring about pain and trauma, what right do you have to continue using it? Use it properly or be ready to lose it. Prison terms are not a major deterrent, and they are generally lax simply because the people passing judgement are men and female judges have their hands tied by law. All rape laws should be written and enforced with that thought process - 'responsible usage of your appendage'. It will serve as a great deterrent, because society will always have wretched beings who think with their appendage and respond more to fear than any rationale or imploration.
What we need is Fumanism - furious humanism, involving passion around all causes that are about neutrality and fairness. Given that women make 50% of the human population, feminism is a huge one that deserves immediate and continuing attention under the Fumanism umbrella. And it needs to be a combination of education and deterrence. Because there are and will always be elements that do not respond to positivity. They need to be painfully aware of the consequences of their destructive actions.
PS. I have to draw the line at the Kardashians. Sorry to judge, but I am human after all. I am not perfect, just awesome.
So the problem with the gender 'equality' conversation is that it talks about bringing women to the table. What people seem to forget is that women have always been at the table. It's the egotistic men who have conveniently chosen to ignore them, and are now reluctantly yielding the floor when faced with pressure to do the right thing. The transition is neither natural, nor organic, but it will slowly become exactly that in a few generations. And there is something to be said about the women who are enablers of this prejudice - every mother who raises her boy and girl differently is complicit, regardless of whatever circumstance forced her mindset.
The right phrase to describe feminism should be gender neutrality, not gender equality. And that does not mean one gender needs to prove their mettle in everything that the other gender has. It simply means that gender should not be a point of discussion where it does not need to, full allowances made if it IS a point of discussion due to the nature of the responsibility, and there should be no condescension or prejudice at play in the process. Resilience, emotional strength, empathy, and integrity are qualities not specific to gender, yet somehow get processed differently based on which gender is displaying them. A confident man is a confident man, but a confident woman is brash, overbearing, and argumentative. That should not be the case. And there should be no differentiation because of things being approached or done differently by the genders.
Objectification is a major issue, and there are 2 aspects to this. The first is the overhyped concept of beauty - looks are something you are born with, not something you develop with dedication and perseverance. And complimenting someone solely on their looks just perpetuates the hype. The second is a result of the first - the concept of beauty has led to rampant objectification of women, and that is a tragedy. And somehow man, threatened by that beauty, appointed himself guardian (read 'owner') of that beauty, and started dictating what women should or should not do. While this exists to some extent in every culture, it is at ridiculous extremes in specific ones where the law itself refuses to recognize women as human beings. And even in the developed world, female body parts are used to sell electronics, automobiles, and anything and everything that is not in context. So how exactly is it a developed world? Beauty pageants still abound, and looks sell more than voices. Why?
Human biology is not helpful in the process - when equipped with higher strength, the protruding object will force its way into a recessed object without any thought to respect or empathy, when driven by prejudice, opinion, and utterly infuriating and quaint concepts of what is right and wrong. The right biological design would have ensured equal strength across both genders, and the reproductive organs designed not as provider and receiver.
The current biological design begs a simple question regarding the sexual crimes that happen against women - when you drive a car irresponsibly and hurt people, you lose your license. So if you are equipped with an appendage that you use to bring about pain and trauma, what right do you have to continue using it? Use it properly or be ready to lose it. Prison terms are not a major deterrent, and they are generally lax simply because the people passing judgement are men and female judges have their hands tied by law. All rape laws should be written and enforced with that thought process - 'responsible usage of your appendage'. It will serve as a great deterrent, because society will always have wretched beings who think with their appendage and respond more to fear than any rationale or imploration.
What we need is Fumanism - furious humanism, involving passion around all causes that are about neutrality and fairness. Given that women make 50% of the human population, feminism is a huge one that deserves immediate and continuing attention under the Fumanism umbrella. And it needs to be a combination of education and deterrence. Because there are and will always be elements that do not respond to positivity. They need to be painfully aware of the consequences of their destructive actions.
PS. I have to draw the line at the Kardashians. Sorry to judge, but I am human after all. I am not perfect, just awesome.